The application of poor experience to inventory the existing smart TV 5 major shortcomings

If the history of the TV industry is to be traced back after several years, 2011 is definitely a year that cannot be overlooked, because it was during this year that Smart TV formally emerged from the concept of unfamiliar vagueness as a clearly visible entity product. Since the beginning of Samsung Smart TV at the beginning of the year, many domestic and foreign appliance manufacturers have launched smart TV business. By the second half of the year, Samsung, LG, Hisense, Skyworth, TCL, Changhong, Konka and many other models have been launched. While these intelligent television pioneer models have displayed numerous commendable highlights, they also exposed a considerable number of defects. The author will briefly review the five major shortcomings of smart TVs. Experts are not correct.

The control sensitivity is not high. The smart English word in the digital product is smart, literally translated with sensitive meaning. Coincidentally, regardless of the smart phone or tablet, the control sensitivity is a key factor affecting the pros and cons of the product. We can imagine that when your smart phone will have a noticeable delay or pause during each step of operation, even if such a mobile phone is equipped with a smart operating system, I am afraid that it cannot afford a smart title.

However, in the smart TVs that are currently available, most of them have the problem of slow response, especially when dealing with some slightly larger tasks. Some models may even be delayed by more than one second. With such a fluent operating experience, users will lose patience even with excellent applications.

The number of intelligent applications is small Since it is a smart TV, a wide variety of applications are indispensable. Some time ago, Samsung announced a high-profile announcement that Smart TV's TV applications had been downloaded more than 10 million times worldwide. It also released a relatively embarrassing data. The number of exclusive applications for smart TVs was only about 900, which was a great disparity with mobile phones. The number of mobile-end applications for Apple iOS and Google Android is already in the hundreds of thousands.

It is not worth mentioning such a lack of smart applications, but as smart TVs of various brands are launched in the second half of the year, we are surprised to find that the number of smart applications of Samsung is simply “mass”, because most brands use smart TVs. Stores actually only provide dozens of exclusive app downloads.

The poor matching of applications in the end what is the most suitable for smart applications for television, we do not know, it seems TV manufacturers are not clear. Judging from the current applications on smart TVs, it is still based on popular applications ported to mobile phones and pads, such as Weibo, QQ, Fruit Ninja, Angry Birds, etc., without forming a large-scale development team. It can also be understood.

However, many applications cannot be simply ported to TVs. For example, the screen size, smart TVs are generally in the full HD level of 16:9 and 1920×1080, and quite a lot of mobile phone applications do not comply; for example, some rely on gravity sensing to operate. The game is very suitable for the mobile phone and pad, but after changing to the remote direction keys, there is no fun.

The price of smart TVs is slightly higher. Currently, smart systems are the cutting-edge technologies in the TV industry, and the hardware support required is also relatively high. Therefore, all brands are generally used only on high-end models. This directly results in a high price of smart TVs. In particular, foreign brands are more obvious, such as LG's smart model LW9800 priced at more than 20,000 yuan, Samsung D8000, D7000 smart series are also more than 10,000 yuan. In addition, the price difference between smart and non-intelligent models with the same brand is also obvious. Take TCL's two 46-inch 3D TVs P7200 and V7300 as examples. The two are almost the same in terms of parameters. The former does not have intelligent functions while the latter Is a smart TV, the difference in the price of more than a thousand dollars.

Some big-name manufacturers are absent When major TV manufacturers actively accelerate the pace of television intelligence, Japanese color TV giants Sony, Sharp, and Panasonic have consistently maintained their positions. In the eyes of some “picture quality control” users, the absence of these three big names makers undoubtedly made the smart TV’s gloomy gloomy, reminiscent of Fujimichi Kinji’s extremely conceited sentence in the classic animation “Slam Dunk Master”. - "You actually competed for the king of Kanagawa without my court."

Considering that the three Japanese TVs used to have slow lags in USB playback and network functions, the tradition of re-characterizing lightweight functions has been a long time ago, but in the end it has followed the trend of the industry. Even under the general trend of intelligentization, I am afraid that they cannot help but look at it again. Next year, we are likely to see Sony, Sharp and Panasonic’s smart TV models available.

Conclusion: The development of smart TV is still in its infancy. The current smart model is naturally impossible to perfect. I also know that the shortcomings of reviewing a newborn baby are too cruel, but there are several deficiencies mentioned above, especially the operation. Sensitivity, number of applications, and matching degree are all directly related to user experience. It is also hoped that major manufacturers will improve and make Smart TV a truly revolutionary product after smart phones.